Practice Fields
•    Criminal compliance and defense
•    Litigation & arbitration

Educational Background
•    September 1992, China University of Political Science and Law

Typical Cases
•    intentional killing of Wang (the defendant committed the crime with cruel means, and intended to burn the body after the killing. The victim was only 17 years old and pregnant, and the victim’s family only received partial civil compensation. It was not easy to suspend the execution of the death sentence for two years at that time)
•    contract fraud of Chen from Taiwan (the defendant’s family members were not in the mainland; the defender went alone, broke through many difficulties to obtain the victim’s letter of understanding and exhausted the defense point of view in favor of the defendant to fight for the minimum sentence for the defendant)
•    major organization and leadership pyramid selling of Wu and Tian from Zhuhai (involving more than RMB 14 billion and more than 40 defendants, and supervised by the Ministry of Public Security)
•    major illegal storage and transportation explosives of Tan, et al (this case happened at the eve of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and all departments paid close attention to it. The defender focused on the actual civilian use of explosives in transportation and successfully obtained the support of the court, and obtained the result of probation for the defendant)
•    environmental pollution of a large state-owned enterprise (representative case of criminal risk prevention and control and protection of rights and interests)
•    equity transfer dispute of Shuangliao Haotian Highway Maintenance Engineering Co., Ltd. (the appellant of the second instance successfully sent the case back for retrial)
•    disputes over falsification of the resolution at the shareholders’ meeting of National Energy Corporation
•    dispute over infringement upon right of reputation of Luo (nearly 100 national media were “invited” to Beijing Xicheng District People’s Court in this series of cases, which lasted for two years; the legitimate rights and interests of the parties were safeguarded, and a warning was given to the streaming media for exercise of the duty of careful examination when “eating fast food”)